Gisha Legal Center for Freedom of Movement.

  •  
  •  
  •  
  • About
    • About Gisha
    • Board
    • Gisha Staff
    • FAQs
    • Vacancies
    • Institutional Donors
  • Topics
    • Control over Gaza
    • Economy and Development
    • Access to Education
    • Family Unity
    • Residency Rights
    • Other
  • Legal Activity
    • Legal Advocacy
    • Procedures and Protocols
  • Media
    • Gisha in the media
    • News Releases
    • Media Inquiries
  • Reports & Data
    • Publications
    • Graphs
    • Gaza up close
  • Gallery
    • Image Gallery
    • Video Gallery
  • Get Involved
    • Donate
    • Get information
    • UNDO the closure
    • Campaigns
  • Updates
    • Updates
    • Gisha in Action
  • Contact Us
Legal Activity » Legal Advocacy » Gisha petitions High Court for reinstatement of Gaza resident’s Israeli citizenship

Gisha petitions High Court for reinstatement of Gaza resident’s Israeli citizenship

On October 22, 2017, Gisha filed a petition with the High Court of Justice (Hebrew), on behalf of a Gaza resident whose application for her Israeli citizenship to be reinstated had been rejected by the Ministry of Interior.

The Ministry of Interior revoked the petitioner’s citizenship in 1990, when she moved to Gaza with her Palestinian husband. When she entered the Strip, the Israeli Civil Administration authority had the petitioner sign a waiver of Israeli citizenship (Hebrew) in Hebrew using her fingerprint, as she could not read or write. The petitioner did not know what the document meant or understand what she was signing. In fact, she only found out her citizenship had been revoked recently, by chance, when the Ministry of Interior denied her application for an Israeli passport. When the petitioner submitted a Freedom of Information application to receive all the documents in her population registry file, the documents related to the revocation of her citizenship were not disclosed to her.

The revocation of the petitioner’s citizenship in 1990 was consistent with the Ministry of Interior’s policy at the time with respect to Palestinian women with Israeli citizenship who sought to move to the occupied Palestinian territory to live with their husbands. The policy, which was never formalized or officially published, as required by law, was discussed by the High Court in the context of a petition filed in 1998. Following that case, the Ministry of Interior formulated a protocol (Hebrew) for the Israeli citizenship of women affected by this policy to be reinstated, subject to security clearance. Though the petition from 1998 related to women who had divorced their husbands and wished to move back to Israel, the protocol does not specify any conditions for reinstating women’s citizenship, other than intent to permanently reside in Israel and security clearance.

On April 3, 2017, Gisha’s petitioner had filed an application under the protocol to have her Israeli citizenship reinstated. It was rejected (Hebrew) on July 16, 2017 by the Ministry of Interior. The ministry claimed that the fact that the petitioner was still married to her spouse, a resident of Gaza, and that she had not included her young daughter in the application, called into question her intent to permanently reside in Israel. The petitioner appealed the refusal, but her appeal was rejected (Hebrew), without a pertinent response to the arguments it presented. On October 22, 2017, Gisha filed an administrative petition against the Ministry of Interior.

In the petition, Gisha argued that the Ministry of Interior’s decision must be rescinded, and the petitioner’s Israeli citizenship reinstated, as she met the criteria specified in the protocol, which only requires a declaration of intent to reside permanently in Israel. The protocol does not include a requirement for separation from the spouse, or submission of an application for minor children. The petition argued that the Ministry of Interior decision was based on irrelevant information and that it was unreasonable and disproportionate – even if the Ministry of Interior doubts the petitioner’s intention of living in Israel, it should give her the chance to remove this doubt by granting her temporary residency and monitoring her living arrangements going forward.

The court ordered the Ministry of Interior to file its response by December 21, 2017.

     

More in Legal Advocacy

  • Following petition, Israel allows a Palestinian woman to move back to the West Bank with her young children
  • Following petition, Israel allows a 75-year-old widow to return home to the West Bank from the Gaza Strip
  • Following petition, Israel allows a mother and her four children to return home to the West Bank from the Gaza Strip
  • Court ordered deletion of petition filed on behalf of a cancer patient wishing to return to her home in Gaza from Jordan, after her condition deteriorates
  • Israel denies two sisters’ participation in mourning rituals for their father in the West Bank

Gisha's Blog

Recent posts:
Naming the reality‬
12.01.2021
Same storm, different boats‬
23.12.2020
“Holidays are sad days”‬
16.12.2020
Donate
Get information
1.4 Million Did you know that seventy percent of the population in Gaza, 1.4 million people, are under 30 years old?
Watch the video
Gallery
Distant | Relatives
facebook icon   Gisha on Facebook
twitter icon   Gisha on Twitter
  • Homepage
  • About
  • About Gisha
  • Board
  • Gisha Staff
  • FAQs
  • Terms of Use
  • Vacancies
  • Legal Activity
  • Legal Advocacy
  • Procedures and Protocols
  • Media
  • Gisha in the media
  • News Releases
  • Reports & Data
  • Publications
  • Graphs
  • Gaza Up Close
  • Gallery
  • Image Gallery
  • Video Gallery
  • Updates
  • Updates
  • Gisha in Action
  • Get Involved
  • Donate
  • Get information
  • Contact Us
 TechnoCraft |  בניית אתרים | סטודיו ג2 | Copyright © 2021 Gisha.org